1. photo

    71,112 notes
    Sep 23 6:09AM
  2. dita-von:

Dita Von Teese http://dita-von.tumblr.com/

    photo

    101 notes
    Sep 23 5:17AM
  3. (Source: moreorleslie, via alexkoslov)

    photo

    4,999 notes
    Sep 23 4:26AM
  4. greg-pak:

I think I’ve figured out how to get a Superman/Harry Potter team up past legal.
From SUPERMAN #258, 1972.
via

    greg-pak:

    I think I’ve figured out how to get a Superman/Harry Potter team up past legal.

    From SUPERMAN #258, 1972.

    via

    photo

    67 notes
    Sep 23 3:34AM
  5. mari-m-art:

    :3 <3

    got inspiration from the latest fics at the Sinestro tag from fallacyfinale 

    (via emmafrosticle)

    photo

    801 notes
    Sep 23 2:43AM
  6. (Source: flowerboyzico, via peacefulcalamity)

    photo

    774 notes
    Sep 23 1:51AM
  7. wrasslormonkey:

What was THAT noise? (by @WrasslorMonkey)

    wrasslormonkey:

    What was THAT noise? (by @WrasslorMonkey)

    photo

    192 notes
    Sep 23 12:17AM
  8. magnacarterholygrail:

    GOODFUCKINGBYE

    (Source: luckythinks91, via kumagawa)

    video

    6,538 notes
    Sep 23 12:10AM
  9. malefactum:

    The Blacklist is on Netflix what are you doing with your life

    image

    I haven’t seen the full thing yet but i’m enjoying the first season a lot so far

    text

    81 notes
    Sep 23 12:04AM
  10. joachimmurat:

lediableaquatre:

redrum-my-dear:

stem-cell:

rosalarian:

pourquoi-nutmeg:

nortonism:

The thing about this is that sculptures like these in art history were for the male gaze. Photoshop a phone to it and suddenly she’s seen as vain and conceited. That’s why I’m 100% for selfie culture because apparently men can gawk at women but when we realize how beautiful we are we’re suddenly full of ourselves…

YES.

Girls don’t let anyone tell you loving yourself is vanity.

“You painted a naked woman because you enjoyed looking at her, put a mirror in her hand and you called the painting “Vanity,” thus morally condemning the woman whose nakedness you had depicted for you own pleasure.” ― John Berger, Ways of Seeing

"Sculptures like that were for the male gaze". Are you serious? Like, for real? Have you got any notion of art history at all or are you just arbitrarily applying today’s views to the classical world because hey, it’s Tumblr?

Sculptures like that were for the male gaze. Hum, yes. It’s not as though most famous sculptures are of men (David for once). It’s not as though most famous sculptures are of religious themes (pietà). Also have you ever looked at Bernini? 
Not to mention of course that most sculptures that regard classical theme have men as their object because of the whole male beauty and Antiquity theme. (Depictions of Gods and heroes for instance).
John Berger obviously forgot that in his haste to speak about the “feminine” that many artists that sculpted and painted were not really interested in the female body. Lol, awkward.

I love it when art history and common sense team up to clobber the senseless.

    joachimmurat:

    lediableaquatre:

    redrum-my-dear:

    stem-cell:

    rosalarian:

    pourquoi-nutmeg:

    nortonism:

    The thing about this is that sculptures like these in art history were for the male gaze. Photoshop a phone to it and suddenly she’s seen as vain and conceited. That’s why I’m 100% for selfie culture because apparently men can gawk at women but when we realize how beautiful we are we’re suddenly full of ourselves…

    YES.

    Girls don’t let anyone tell you loving yourself is vanity.

    “You painted a naked woman because you enjoyed looking at her, put a mirror in her hand and you called the painting “Vanity,” thus morally condemning the woman whose nakedness you had depicted for you own pleasure.” ― John Berger, Ways of Seeing

    "Sculptures like that were for the male gaze". Are you serious? Like, for real? Have you got any notion of art history at all or are you just arbitrarily applying today’s views to the classical world because hey, it’s Tumblr?

    Sculptures like that were for the male gaze. Hum, yes. It’s not as though most famous sculptures are of men (David for once). It’s not as though most famous sculptures are of religious themes (pietà). Also have you ever looked at Bernini? 

    Not to mention of course that most sculptures that regard classical theme have men as their object because of the whole male beauty and Antiquity theme. (Depictions of Gods and heroes for instance).

    John Berger obviously forgot that in his haste to speak about the “feminine” that many artists that sculpted and painted were not really interested in the female body. Lol, awkward.

    I love it when art history and common sense team up to clobber the senseless.

    (Source: nevver, via grenadierfifer)

    Sep 22 7:55PM